
Heart Rate Zones: How to Calculate and Why Zone 2 Matters
How to set heart rate training zones without a lab test, why 220 minus age is unreliable, how the Karvonen method works, and what Zone 2 actually builds.
Calculate your five training zones with the Karvonen heart rate reserve method. Uses the Tanaka formula instead of the outdated 220 − age, and shows how to split your weekly volume.
Updated: August 3, 2026 · 🔒 Your data never leaves your browser
Training zones are built from your maximum heart rate and your resting heart rate. At 35 the Tanaka formula gives a maximum of about 184 bpm; with a resting pulse of 60, Karvonen puts zone 2 at 134–147 bpm. That is where most of your training time should sit — though for most amateurs less than a third of it does.
Sex
Measure in the morning before getting out of bed, three days running, and take the average. Overnight data from a watch works too.
Karvonen accounts for your resting heart rate and describes real effort more accurately. Watches usually use percentage of max — switch to compare with what your screen shows.
Estimated maximum
184
bpm
Heart rate reserve
122
184 − 62
Resting heart rate
62
Good
The outdated “220 − age” would give 185 bpm
Your zones
Z1 · Recovery
Full conversation, breathing barely changes. Cool-downs, recovery days, walking
67–74%
of max
Z2 · Aerobic base
You can speak in sentences; this is where endurance is built. 60–80% of total volume: long easy runs and rides
74–80%
of max
Z3 · Tempo
Talking is hard but possible — the grey zone. Use sparingly: too hard for volume, too easy for VO₂max
80–87%
of max
Z4 · Threshold
Single words only, burning legs. Intervals of 8–20 minutes, tempo blocks
87–93%
of max
Z5 · Maximal
No talking, sustainable for minutes. Short intervals of 30 seconds to 4 minutes, drives VO₂max
93–100%
of max
Splitting your weekly volume
The polarized model: roughly 80% of time in the first two zones, roughly 20% in the fourth and fifth. Most amateurs do the opposite and spend nearly everything in zone 3 — hard enough to tire, not hard enough to develop.
⚠️ When these numbers do not apply
Beta blockers, some antiarrhythmics and blood pressure medication lower both resting and maximum heart rate, which makes any age-based estimate meaningless. The same goes for atrial fibrillation and pacemakers. In those cases zones come from a clinical exercise test, not a formula.
Individual maximum scatters around any formula by roughly ±7 bpm, meaning one person in three is more than 7 beats away from their predicted value. A formula sets your starting boundaries; only a test — or months of watching your own heart rate at known efforts — refines them.
Zones are built in two steps.
Step one — maximum heart rate. The default is the Tanaka equation (208 − 0.7 × age): across a meta-analysis of 351 studies it showed no systematic drift with age, unlike 220 − age. For women the calculator defaults to the Gulati equation, derived from a cohort of 5,437 women.
Step two — heart rate reserve. Subtract your resting pulse from your maximum; what remains is the room your heart actually works in. Zone boundaries are then laid out upward from your resting heart rate as percentages of that reserve. That is the Karvonen method.
| Zone | % of reserve | How it feels | What it is for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Z1 · Recovery | 50–60 | Easy conversation | Cool-downs, easy days, walking |
| Z2 · Aerobic base | 60–70 | Full sentences | The bulk of volume: mitochondria, capillaries, fat oxidation |
| Z3 · Tempo | 70–80 | Talking is hard | The grey zone — use sparingly |
| Z4 · Threshold | 80–90 | Single words | Lactate threshold, intervals of 8–20 minutes |
| Z5 · Maximal | 90–100 | No speech at all | VO₂max, intervals of 30 seconds to 4 minutes |
The talk test deserves its own mention: it costs nothing and is surprisingly accurate. The boundary between zones 1 and 2 lands roughly where speech stops being entirely effortless, and the step into zone 4 lands where a sentence breaks into two or three words.
Читайте также: Heart Rate Training Zones: Training by Pulse Without Guesswork
Professionals spend around 80% of their time in zones 1 and 2 and around 20% in zones 4 and 5. Zone 3 is nearly empty. Amateurs do precisely the reverse: almost everything lands in zone 3.
The logic is understandable — easy running feels pointless, and going genuinely hard every session is not sustainable. The problem is that zone 3 fails in both directions. It is taxing enough to accumulate fatigue and interfere with recovery, and not intense enough to stimulate VO₂max. You cannot build volume there, and it does not buy you quality.
The practical consequence: if you feel tired after an easy session, it probably was not easy. Genuine zone 2 in an untrained person often feels embarrassingly slow — up to and including walking the hills.
Читайте также: Zone 2: Why Slow Training Delivers More Than Fast Training
The adult range is 60–100 bpm, but values inside that corridor are not equivalent. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study cohort, every additional 10 beats at rest came with roughly 16% higher mortality — independently of fitness and classical risk factors.
The practical use is more immediate still: a resting pulse 5–7 beats above your own usual figure is a reliable early sign of incomplete recovery, an infection starting, or accumulated sleep debt. That is a day to move the hard session.
Читайте также: Resting Heart Rate: What Is Normal and How to Lower It
It does not know your real maximum. Individual values scatter around any formula by roughly ±7 bpm: one person in three is more than 7 beats from their predicted figure, and that is biological variation rather than a flaw in the equation.
It ignores heat, altitude, dehydration and caffeine, all of which raise your heart rate at the same workload. It ignores cardiac drift, where your pulse creeps upward during long efforts at unchanged pace. And it does not apply with arrhythmias or on medication that alters cardiac rhythm.
If you need precision once, a laboratory exercise test with gas analysis provides it. If you need it across months, the best data source is your own heart rate at familiar efforts, recorded and reviewed over a long stretch of time.
Use the Tanaka formula: 208 − 0.7 × age. At 40 that is 180 bpm. It beats the familiar 220 − age, which was never published as a study and systematically overestimates the maximum past forty. For women the Gulati equation is more accurate still: 206 − 0.88 × age.
Because it is a line drawn by eye through someone else's data in the 1970s rather than a research finding. Robergs and Landwehr traced its origin in 2002 and showed a standard error of roughly 7–11 bpm along with a systematic overestimate in people over 40. It survived purely on how easy it is to remember.
A calculation based on heart rate reserve: target = resting HR + percentage × (max HR − resting HR). Unlike a plain percentage of maximum it accounts for fitness. For someone resting at 45 and someone resting at 75, '70% of max' means very different physiological work, while '70% of reserve' means comparable work.
In the morning, immediately on waking, without getting out of bed, three days running — then average them. Overnight data from a watch works too, since it takes the minimum across your sleep. Resting heart rate rises with short sleep, illness, stress and alcohol, so a single reading tells you little.
Roughly 60–80% of your total volume. That distribution — the polarized model — is what high-level endurance athletes actually do. Amateurs typically do the opposite, spending almost everything in zone 3, which is already too hard to accumulate volume and still too easy to raise VO₂max.
Watches almost always compute zones as a percentage of maximum rather than of reserve, and they default to 220 − age unless you enter your own maximum. Switch the calculator to 'percentage of max' and the numbers will line up. Karvonen still describes the physiology more accurately.
No. Beta blockers lower both resting and maximum heart rate, and by an amount that cannot be predicted for an individual, which makes any age-based estimate meaningless. The same applies with atrial fibrillation or a pacemaker. In those cases zones come from a clinical exercise test, and rate of perceived exertion is the better guide during training.

How to set heart rate training zones without a lab test, why 220 minus age is unreliable, how the Karvonen method works, and what Zone 2 actually builds.

What zone 2 actually is, how to find it without a lactate test, how much time it deserves, and why the polarized model beats the familiar habit of running everything at a medium pace.

Normal resting heart rate is 60–100 bpm. What a low or high pulse means, how to measure it correctly, the link to longevity, and when to see a doctor.